Design and Construction of Roads, Bridges, and Tunnels

 DOI.org/10.5281/zenodo.1408243

Gerasimenko M., Kamornyy V.

MIKHAIL GERASIMENKO, Doctor of Engineering Sciences, Professor, Chief Researcher,
e-mail: mdg@iam.dvo.ru

Institute of Applied Mathematics, FEB RUS (and Department of Geodesy,
Land Management and Cadastre, School of Engineering, FEFU)

VALERIY KAMORNYY, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, Professor, Department
of Geodesy, Land Management and Cadastre, School of Engineering, e-mail: kamornyy.vm@dvfu.ru

Far Eastern Federal University
8 Sukhanova St., Vladivostok, Russia, 690091

The ways of detection and rejection of gross errors
in geodetic measurements

Abstract: The article presents the theoretical basis of the well-known method to detect and localise gross errors of measurements through correction for compensation. The results of the works in which it was applied have been summarised and complemented. The foundation of the technique was laid in the 1960s, yet, unfortunately, it has not been adequately publicised in the national geodetic literature, although today’s ways of the registration of measurements and calculations make the issue of the automated detection of possible gross errors very important. Highlighted are virtues and deficiencies of the method. The issue is significant for the land surveys when building roads, tunnels, and other construction objects.
Key words: adjustment, measurement amendments, geodetic measurements, gross errors.

 REFERENCES

1.      Bolshakov V.D., Markuse Yu.I. Practice on the theory of mathematical processing of geodetic measurements. Moscow, Nedra. 1984, 352 p.

2.      Gerasimenko M.D. To the problem of revealing crude measurement errors. Izvestiya Vuzov. Geodesy and aerial photography. 2010;6:3–6.

3.      Gerasimenko M.D., Kamorny V.M., Kaftan V.I. Processing of planned and spatial geodetic networks on geodynamic polygons. Geodesy and cartography. 1993;2:16–21.

4.      Kougia V.A. Remarks on the methods for rejecting coarse measurement errors.
URL: http://www.spbogik.ru/images/download/kougiya2011.pdf – 05.01.2018.

5.      Kougiya V.A. Comparison of two methods for detecting and identifying rough measurement errors. Geodesy and Cartography. 1998;5:23–28.

6.      Linnik Yu.V. The method of least squares and the foundations of the mathematical-statistical theory of processing dimensions. Moscow, State Publishing House, 1958, 334 p.

7.      Ackermann F. Grundlagen und Verfahren zur Erkennung grober Datenfehler. Institut fur Photogrammretrie der Universitat Stuttgart. Vortrage des Lehrgangs Numerische Photogrammretrie (IV). Schriftenreihe. Heft 7. Stuttgart, 1981, p. 7–23.

8.      Bingcai Zhang. A new method of data snooping. Australian J. of Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Surveying. 1987;46–47:103–122.

9.      Caspary W.F. Concepts of network and deformation analysis. Monograph 11 School of Surveying, The University of New South Wales, Kensington, 1987, N.S.W., Australia, 183 p.

10.   Cen M., Li Z., Ding X., Zhuo J. Gross error diagnostics before least squares adjustment of observations. J. of Geodesy. 2003;77:503–513.

11.   Cross P.A., Price D.R. A strategy for the distinction between single and multiple gross errors in geodetic networks. Manuscripta geodaetica. 1985;10:172–178.

12.   Ou Z.Q. Sequential tests for outliers in the general linear model. Australian J. of Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Surveying. 1987;50:37–49.